Как интервью с Бошировым-петровым испортило имидж раше тудэй

This interview could have been simply one more episode in the fierce narrative battle between British and Russian authorities. However, this does not appear to have been the case, according to the latest research from the “Reframing Russia” project, which looks at the state broadcaster’s efforts to reshape Russia’s external image. The data suggest that — for RT, at least — this broadcast backfired.

RT has tried to discredit the British case

In its earliest reporting on the Salisbury poisoning, RT sought to draw into question key elements of the official British case. RT headlines focused not on the case itself, but on how the U.K. media was reporting it. One headline, for instance, read “Blame precedes evidence.”

RT’s reporting was factually accurate, based around statements from the police or headlines generated in mainstream media outlets. However, the network told the story from the Russian point of view, with Russia merely responding to other states’ actions.

RT relied heavily on a particular selection of guests who highlighted inconsistencies in official U.K. accounts. Russia’s ambassador to Britain gave his thoughts in op-eds and interviews. “Putin’s former spin doctor” Alexander Nekrassov was another repeat commentator.

Likewise, former British intelligence officials Charles Shoebridge and Annie Machon contributed to several talk shows. Machon and Nekrassov also provided commentary for the BBC, but other regularly featured experts gave conspiratorial contributions unlikely to be hosted on other networks.

The tone of RT’s programming tended to vary dramatically, depending on the program and the journalist hosting it. One consistent theme throughout the Skripal coverage was the network’s critiques of Western political institutions and Western media. RT coverage also employed dismissive irony, humor and informality — and used social media responses to show there was wider skepticism about British claims.

Did this strategy work? Yes — but only initially.

Our social media research suggests that, initially, English-speaking RT audiences accepted RT’s skepticism about official British accounts of the poisoning. RT’s YouTube “Skripal” playlist of 60 videos has more than 1.6 million combined views and more than 32,000 comments. These videos were upvoted a total of 32,000 times, compared with only 4,200 downvotes, which suggests that viewers largely agree with their content.

To understand how audiences were reacting to RT’s reporting, we analyzed the top 100 most-liked comments on two specific videos discussing the Skripal case. On one video, 73 percent of the comments suggested that there was a conspiracy at work, with claims such as “it is more likely the CIA poisoned them to place blame on Russia.” Some 44 percent of comments were critical of the U.K. and its allies, and 27 percent noted inconsistencies in British claims. Only 4 of the comments were critical of Russia, Putin or RT’s claims.

In response to another video, 35 percent of commentators suggested conspiracy theories, 95 percent of the comments were critical of the U.K., and 26 percent suggested inconsistencies in the British narrative. Only one of Perhaps the response of English-speaking audiences is no real concern, if the main purpose of the interview was designed more for domestic audiences. But if that was the intent, the interview also appears to have failed. Russia’s state-controlled domestic TV ignored the video’s critical reception, but newspapers have not been so forgiving. And the YouTube comments on RT’s Russian version of the interview have been just as negative as those in English. One viewer said: “Until today I perceived this Skripal story as Britain’s provocation. But once I saw these two idiots, my view has been shaken.”

To date, RT has pitched itself as a network at ease with the new digital world, prepared to tell uncomfortable truths in a media environment dominated by the institutions and power structures of the “West.”Criticism of the network, RT suggests, is fueled by Russophobes frightened at its challenge to those in power.

The poor reception to the Skripal suspects’ interview shows the fragility of RT’s position — and its ability to act as a soft power instrument of the Russian state — along with its failure to judge online audiences. As one comment on RT’s interview put it: “by posting this video and also not disabling comments you’ve totally screwed yourselves.”the top 100 comments was critical of Russia — but it also stated that the U.K. government was similarly untrustworthy.

And then the interview landed

Perhaps the response of English-speaking audiences is no real concern, if the main purpose of the interview was designed more for domestic audiences. But if that was the intent, the interview also appears to have failed. Russia’s state-controlled domestic TV ignored the video’s critical reception, but newspapers have not been so forgiving. And the YouTube comments on RT’s Russian version of the interview have been just as negative as those in English. One viewer said: “Until today I perceived this Skripal story as Britain’s provocation. But once I saw these two idiots, my view has been shaken.”

To date, RT has pitched itself as a network at ease with the new digital world, prepared to tell uncomfortable truths in a media environment dominated by the institutions and power structures of the “West.”Criticism of the network, RT suggests, is fueled by Russophobes frightened at its challenge to those in power.

The poor reception to the Skripal suspects’ interview shows the fragility of RT’s position — and its ability to act as a soft power instrument of the Russian state — along with its failure to judge online audiences. As one comment on RT’s interview put it: “by posting this video and also not disabling comments you’ve totally screwed yourselves.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com ... 9fdcc

_________________
Сердечно поздравляю всех с 24 июня и 3 сентября Гы-Ы

Чукча, в глазах публики вы окончательно стали полицаем - в чёрной униформе и с белой повязочкой на рукаве. Удовольствие дискутировать с полицаями мало кого привлекает. Ваше пребывание на форуме контрпродуктивно - неужели вы этого не понимаете? Вы предсказуемы как грампластинка. Где-то вас даже жалко...

_________________
"Я против повышения пенсионного возраста. И пока я президент, такого решения принято не будет." В.В. Путин.

мнение Фашингтонской Правды нам очень ценно...

_________________
Ура! мы ломим; гнутся (с) хохлы
==========================
Помни! 14 марта 1990 года - день Капитуляции КПСС (и пройоба СССР)

А нет ли тут элемента вмешательства в выборы РФ с помощью соц сети for-ua.info

_________________
Список Игнора
Сергеевна -Караганда -Маик -mas-Крамольник-sa78-из Москвы-vs773-Кот_Инвойс,-Кука-Bertals-Индифферент

-

Вот ещё очень интересная информация:

Doi agenţi ruşi - suspectaţi că au încercat să spioneze un laborator elveţian căruia i-a fost încredinţată analiza agentului neurotoxic Noviciok utilizat, potrivit Londrei, în otrăvirea fostului agent rus Serghei Skripal şi a fiicei sale Iulia la Salisbury (sud-vestul Angliei) - reţinuţi primăvara trecută în Olanda sunt suspecţi şi în cazul unei tentative de atac cibernetic asupra Agenţiei Mondiale Antidoping (AMA/WADA), potrivit procuraturii din Berna, transmite sâmbătă EFE.

Ministerul Public din oraşul elveţian a confirmat informaţia pentru cotidianele olandez NRC şi elveţian Tages-Anzeiger, care publică sâmbătă aceste date.

În septembrie 2016, AMA/WADA, al cărei sediu european se află la Lausanne (Elveţia), a confirmat că a fost victima unui atac cibernetic din partea unui grup de piraţi informatici ruşi autointitulat 'Fancy Bear', care a avut acces la informaţii despre sportivi, inclusiv la date medicale confidenţiale. AMA/WADA a considerat că Rusia se află în spatele acestui atac ca represalii faţă de raportul agenţiei care a dezvăluit dopajul patronat de statul rus şi la care au recurs atleţi din această ţară, notează EFE.

Se crede că grupul Fancy Bear este asociat agenţiei de informaţii militare a Rusiei (GRU), din care făceau parte - potrivit guvernului britanic - cei doi ruşi suspectaţi de tentativa de asasinat asupra lui Skripal şi a fiicei sale Iulia, la Salisbury.

Ministerul Public al Confederaţiei Elveţiene a declarat sâmbătă că agenţii ruşi reţinuţi în Olanda făceau obiectul unei anchete din martie 2017 pentru "atac cibernetic împotriva Agenţiei Mondiale Antidoping".

"Ancheta este condusă pe baza unei suspiciuni de spionaj politic", a precizat pentru AFP o purtătoare de cuvânt a ministerului, Linda von Burg. Procurorul general a cerut Ministerului Justiţiei din Elveţia să autorizeze punerea sub urmărire a acestor persoane ca urmare a incidentului de la Agenţia Mondială Antidoping, a adăugat Von Burg. AMA/WADA a refuzat să comenteze. AGERPRES/(AS - editor: Gabriela Ionescu, editor online: Gabriela Badea)

Дебил беглый! " Язык общения на форуме - русский" (с)
Чё тебе не понятно в этих пяти словах?

Профиль, я всегда с удовольствием вас читаю. Вы бесподобны.

К тому, что вы сообщили, могу лишь добавить следующее:

来自中国的葡萄酒进口商结识了格鲁吉亚葡萄酒公司的代表

新华社第比利斯9月15日电由格鲁吉亚国家葡萄酒局管理的一个由葡萄酒大师Debra Meiburg领导的中国葡萄酒进口商代表团正在格鲁吉亚进行工作访问。

Мне кажется, эта информация тоже чрезвычайно важна.

Ай-яй-яй. Запустили видео интервью с 2-мя идиотами, а комментарии не отключили... поэтому "”the top 100 comments was critical of Russia — but it also stated that the U.K. government was similarly untrustworthy", что позволило дебильному чукче начать еще одну свою дебильную ветку с очередным дебильным названием..

ЗЫ: А чуваки действительно идиоты и пидарасы.

_________________
"У СВО нет цели. Только Путь.”(c)

Наверняка, у чуваков полулегальный бизнес на стероидах,
или что-то около этой темы-
бизнес, который не любит публичности.
Теперь всё накрывается медным тазом.
Тихо ходили, тихо возили, а сейчас
каждая британская собака знает.

Да показали с одной целью, потролить, ведь после интервью последней чукче стало ясно что это и близко не стояли к каким либо спец службам, тем более к ГРУ. И как бы версия рассыпается, ну как минимум в глазах здравомыслящих людей, которых я уверен и в Англии ещё есть.

И на чем основан данный вывод?

_________________
Властитель слабый и лукавый, плешивый щеголь, враг труда, нечаянно пригретый славой, над нами царствовал тогда

ВВГ - еще один чукча - писатель , а не читатель )

даже скрепалиха не верит что они агенты ...они перекачанные стероидами контрабандисты

_________________
Список Игнора
Сергеевна -Караганда -Маик -mas-Крамольник-sa78-из Москвы-vs773-Кот_Инвойс,-Кука-Bertals-Индифферент

-

Ты пресуху то видел?, лица их видел? Нихрена так не сыграешь.

Агенты на задании НИКОГДА не ходят вместе, не живут в одном номере, не оставляют комментарии в книгах посетителей кафедралов, не смешивают яды в общественных туалетах тд и тп..

_________________
"У СВО нет цели. Только Путь.”(c)

На высокой вероятности. Разве этого не достаточно?

Ладно бы только британская.

Это ты про что?
Да, я не читатель на английском. Чукча выложил портянку, Профиль добавил... Сейчас ты мне посоветуешь гугл-переводчик? А Нахера?

_________________
Добре спозаранку-надобранич щеневмерлие патриоти-ватобори, кримоблокувадники, ганьбапереможники та бандугетьмани! ТАК!