Спасём Асию Биби

Какието больные у тебя фантазии...

Справка будет?

Ну вот, другое дело... можем же, если захотим...
Читаем дальше...

....Пункты А, В и С статьи 295 пакистанской Конституции позволяют....

Проблема в том, что в Конституции Пакситана 280 статей, как я только что узнал...

The Blasphemy law is a part of the Pakistan Penal Code, which was introduced in 1860 by the British Government to protect religious feelings. It may be observed that Section 295 provides protection to worship places of all classes of religions living in the subcontinent. It does not contain element of discrimination or preference to any class. It maintains equality of all before the law. The law appears to maintain mutual harmony and peace as well as to promote sense of mutual tolerance, understanding and respect in the multifaceted society of the subcontinent. This section represents the typical example of a secular democratic law for benefit of all and loss to none.

Section 295 prohibited:

Injuring or defiling place or worship, with intent to insult the religion of any class. Whoever, destroys, damages or defiles any place of worship, or any object held sacred by any class of persons with the intention of thereby insulting the religion of any class of persons or with the knowledge that any class of persons is likely to consider such destruction, damage or defile­ment as an insult to their religion, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extent to two years, or with fine or with both.

In 1927 when religious riots rocked pre-partition India, 295-A was promulgated: Deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs. Whoever, with deliberate and malicious intention of outrage the religious feelings, or any class of the citizens of Pakistan, by words, either spoken or written or by visible representations, insult or attempts to insult the religion or the religious beliefs of that class, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, or with fine, or both.

This law was amended further in 1982 as 295-B, defiling the Holy Qur’an, was added by Presidential Ordinance 1:

Defiling the copy of Holy Qur’an. Whoever wilfully defiles, damages or desecrates a copy of the Holy Qur’an or of an extract there from or uses it in any derogatory manner for any unlawful purpose shall be punishable with imprisonment for life.

It stipulates life imprisonment for an offender who wilfully defiles a copy or portion of the Holy Qur’an. It may be observed at the very outset that the law provides protection to the Holy Scripture of only one class of the country. The sentence of life under this section is not an expression of administering justice but rather a tempting tool in the hands of the Muslim extremists to hold the members of the religious minorities in religious-cum judicial blackmail for personal vendettas.

That did not satisfy the extremists, they pressurised General Zia-ul-Haq to add 295-C through Criminal Law (amended) Act III of 1986, the Blasphemy against the Holy Prophet. However, it was further amended by the judgement of the Federal Shariat Court making the death penalty mandatory on conviction for the offence of desecrating the name of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). Not only that, but for the first time religious qualification was added to the PPC, so that only a Muslim Judge may hear the case under this section of the law (Section 295-C).

This is read as:

295-C: use of derogatory remarks etc., in respect of the Holy Prophet: – who ever by words, either spoken or written, or by visible representation, or by any imputation innuendo, or insinuation, directly, defiles the sacred name of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) shall be punished with death, or imprisonment for life and shall also be liable for fine.

The law stipulated death penalty or life imprisonment for defiling the name of the prophet of Islam. The Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan while adjudicating on a case in 1991 struck down the option of life imprisonment and made the death penalty obligatory, along with a fine usually very high. The other noteworthy aspect of this section is the absence of the expression wilfully or intentionally in the text of the law. Disregard of the element of will or intention in the law makes the whole environment suspicious for the reason that “will” or “intention” is an essential part of human behaviour in the context of identifying a criminal offence. Thus under section 295-C, a person committing offence without “will” or “intention” is awarded death sentence at par with the one committing it “wilfully” or “intentionally”. We can see that law is required to punish the “unintentional” offence on the same scale as in the case of “intentional” one, without any justification.

These laws seem to protect the embodiments of faith of only one community in a multifaith society, whereas that community is already in majority and ruling class of the country. On the contrary these laws provide no protection to members of other religions and hence they are discriminatory. They are used against the members of other religious communities including Christians, Ahmadis, and Hindus and even against Muslims who have some differences with main sects. It is even being interpreted by extremists as ‘blasphemous’ to claim that it is not necessary for a man to grow his facial hair long in Islam!

Christians are the main targets by the fundamentalist and religious political parties. The law is being used for forced conversion, forcibly taking over the lands and business of Christians, hindering the preaching of Christian faith and for settling personal scores, rivalries and vengeance. Nevertheless, these laws have proved to be the most injurious weapon of active religious persecution by the extremists with encouragement from the government.

Muslims on the other hand also face these problems but only those who are being declared as non-Muslims by the majority known as Sunni. The other sects of Muslims who are declared as non-Muslims are Ahmedis, Shias, Bahais, Zakris, etc. and they also face problem from the majority. They are also accused and charged with blasphemy to settle personal disputes.

Many innocent persons have been falsely accused under these laws and the number is still on the rise. Victims are severely manhandled and even murdered by mobs and individuals; their families go in hiding. They have to leave their home or even their homeland and their dear ones accept exile to save their lives. Their worship places, houses and localities are attacked, burned and destroyed. Those accused have to undergo fierce media trial. Throughout the process of arrest, investigation and trial anyone showing sympathy with the accused is liable to harassment and allegations being made against them of acting in a non-Islamic way. Police are pressurised and blackmailed. Judges are threatened, harassed and have even been killed. Even if the accused is acquitted, they are still hunted and killed by extremists. There are still many in the jails waiting for fair trial.

Проблема в том, что 295- статья пакистанского уголовного кодекса. И большая проблема в том, что ты не узнал, что ни в одной стране мира не назнаяают наказание по конституции. Всегда уголовный кодекс.
http://www.pakistanblasphemylaw.com/?page_id=15

Джиломан Нет резона тратить время и слова на всяких атеистов покуистов.Пусть в своем мире живут.
КОРОЧЕ Я ПРОГОЛОСОВАЛ .ПЕТИЦИЮ и твой нормальный человеческий почин на форуме поддержал.

А, ну то есть, уже не Конституция, а УК... написанный им англичанами, как я понял...
И опять перепевка... ладно, читаем хоть это

...From 1984 to 2004, 5,000 cases of blasphemy were registered in Pakistan and 964 people were charged and accused of blasphemy; 479 Muslims, 340 Ahmadis, 119 Christians, 14 Hindus and 10 others. Thirty-two people charged with blasphemy had been killed extra-judicially. Eighty-six percent of all the cases were reported in Punjab...

Где здесь преследования христиан, а я не уловил... хотя, конечно, по сравнению и индуистами...

Спасибо, камрад.
Я про эту тётку впервые прочитал где-то полгода назад.
Там была масса подробностей.
Я поогорчался что вот, мол, какое зверьё есть на свете, хуже бандерлогов.
Но не понял, что Асия ещё жива.
А вчера прислали ссылку, грядёт очередное рассмотрение апелляции, народ пытается повлиять гласностью и шумом.
Если бы я не подписал, то чувствовал бы себя пидарасом вроде отметившихся в этой ветке.

То что журналисты перепутали конституции с уголовным кодексом- пиши журналистам. А по поводу статистики... Тут такое дело, может ты сможешь понять, несмотря на свои выдающиеся умственные способности. Или по крайней мере догадаться.
Что бы кто то предстал перед судом, этот кто то должен дожить до этого самого суда. И попасть в статистику. В Пакистане это могут сделать не только лишь все. В основном это удается только мусульманам.

...From 1984 to 2004, 5,000 cases of blasphemy were registered in Pakistan and 964 people were charged and accused of blasphemy; 479 Muslims, 340 Ahmadis, 119 Christians, 14 Hindus and 10 others. Thirty-two people charged with blasphemy had been killed extra-judicially. Eighty-six percent of all the cases were reported in Punjab...

Где здесь преследования христиан, а я не уловил... хотя, конечно, по сравнению и индуи

Я не могу назвать себя Христианином, но за невольницу подписался-наших бьют!
И очень сомневаюсь, что против мутного приговора выступил-бы Патриарх Кирилл..

The Blasphemy law is a part of the Pakistan Penal Code, which was introduced in 1860 by the British Government to protect religious feelings.

Я не могу назвать себя Христианином, но за невольницу подписался-наших бьют!
И очень сомневаюсь, что против мутного приговора выступил-бы Патриарх Кирилл..

Везет тебе, за полгода во всем разобрался...
Жаль, детали дела скрываешь.

Он именно что выступил. Год назад.

Патриарх Кирилл призвал сохранить жизнь пакистанской христианке
Патриарх Московский и Всея Руси Кирилл обратился к президенту Пакистана Мамнуну Хусейну с просьбой помиловать приговоренную к повешению христианку Асию Биби. По его мнению, если Биби казнят, это серьезно ухудшит межрелигиозные отношения.
"Казнь Асии Биби не только станет невосполнимой утратой для ее семьи, родных и близких, но и нанесет огромный урон мусульманско-христианскому диалогу, может стать толчком к усилению напряженности между христианами и мусульманами как в Пакистане, так и во всем мире. Убежден, что политическое руководство любого современного государства призвано сознавать свою ответственность за вверенную ему судьбу представителей религиозных меньшинств", — цитирует ТАСС послание патриарха главе Пакистана.
Патриарх Кирилл отметил, что Русская православная церковь обеспокоена вынесенным Биби приговором. "Наша многомиллионная паства присоединяет свой голос к огромному числу людей во всем мире, ратующих за сохранение жизни этой христианки. От имени всех верующих Русской православной церкви призываю Вас, господин президент, помиловать Асию Биби", — пишет он.

Поучаствовал в попытках глобального управления Пакистаном с пиндосского сайта петиций, поздравляю.
Как думаешь, куда тебя пакистанцы пошлют?

Он именно что выступил. Год назад.